McDonald’s USA yesterday shared its ten-year plan to work with its pork suppliers to phase out the use of gestation stalls in its U.S. pork supply. In February, McDonald’s USA announced its commitment to work with its pork suppliers to assess the current state of sow housing and to develop next steps for gestation stall phase out.
The goal of McDonald’s ten-year plan, which was developed with input from its suppliers, pork producers and animal welfare experts, is to source all pork for its U.S. business from producers that do not house pregnant sows in gestation stalls by the end of 2022.
As an interim step, by 2017, McDonald’s will seek to source pork for its U.S. business only from producers who share its commitment to phase out gestation stalls. To achieve this, McDonald’s will work with producers and suppliers to develop needed traceability systems that will verify pork sourced from non-gestation stall supply chains and assess how to best support producers migrating away from gestation stalls.
“We value our relationship with our suppliers, and our shared commitment to animal welfare,” said Dan Gorsky, senior vice president of McDonald’s North America Supply Chain Management. “Our approach seeks to build on the work already in place, and we are also sensitive to the needs of the smaller, independent pork producers in phasing out of gestation stalls.”
“This change is complex and will require additional resources. The ten-year timeline that McDonald’s has outlined is necessary to research and identify better housing alternatives and ensure proper training of employees,” said Dr. Temple Grandin, renowned animal welfare scientist at Colorado State University and member of McDonald’s Animal Welfare Council. “This is really good forward thinking, and I commend McDonald’s for doing it.”
McDonald’s will continue to work with its supplier network and subject matter experts to refine and implement this plan.
In response to McDonald’s announcement, National Pork Board President Everett Forkner released a statement to express his disappointment. He says the company’s decision could put significant pressure on smaller farmers who use gestation stalls to care for their animals.
Forkner, a farmer from Richards, Mo., also says, “For a producer who has built a new barn in the past few years, McDonald’s announced timeline could force them to make significant new investments,” said Forkner. “So to make the conversion, my fellow producers are going to have to go to a banker with a plan that is likely to increase costs and reduce productivity-not a plan that is likely to inspire great confidence in a banker or investor.”
Forkner said publicly held pork production companies with access to capital and bond markets may be able to make the conversion more easily. “And that’s fine if that’s what they choose to do,” he said. “We believe consumers ultimately are likely to pay these higher production costs. But in the meantime, the additional expenses on farmers forced to make this conversion could increase the risk of them having to leave the business.”
He said the National Pork Board’s position continues to be that peer-reviewed research shows overwhelmingly that both individual stalls and open pens are appropriate ways to provide good care to pregnant sows. These decisions mean that farmers are being told by others which of the two systems works best on their farms, he said
“I’ve been in this business a long time,” Forkner said. “I know on my own farm I moved from open pens to stalls many years ago because too many sows were being injured or denied feed. When sows are thrown together they can become very aggressive. Dominant sows physically attack the others, bite them and steal their food. The housing used by most farmers was designed to protect sows from this bullying while they are most vulnerable, during their pregnancies.
Source: McDonald’s & National Pork BoardShare