May 23, 2013

U.S. House of Representatives Drafts Their Version of Farm Bill

House Ag Committee Chair Frank Lucas and Ranking Member Collin Peterson have released a discussion draft of the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013. The bipartisan bill cuts spending, reduces the size of government and makes common-sense reforms. According to Lucas – the bill is responsible and balanced. He says it addresses American’s concerns about federal spending and reforms farm and nutrition policy to improve efficiency and accountability. The Committee is scheduled to markup the farm bill on Wednesday. Lucas suggests full House consideration will happen this summer. Peterson says the draft closely resembles the bipartisan bill the House Agriculture Committee passed last summer. He says it includes a common-sense commodity title that will work for all producers, much-needed reforms to dairy programs and continued support for the sugar program. Peterson says the bill also builds on the investments the 2008 Farm Bill made to fruits and vegetables, farmers markets and local food systems. As for nutrition program reforms – Peterson says he believes there are more responsible ways of doing it. But he says the bottom line is that this is the first step in the process and it’s past time to pass a five-year farm bill.


According to a release from the House Agriculture Committee – highlights of the measure include:

  • Savings of nearly 40-billion dollars in mandatory funds, including the immediate sequestration of six-billion
  • Repeal or consolidation of more than 100 programs
  • Elimination of direct payments, which farmers received regardless of market conditions
  • Streamlining and reforming commodity policy, saving nearly 14-billion dollars while also giving producers a choice in how best to manage risk
  • Inclusion of the first reforms to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) since the Welfare Reform Act of 1996, saving more than 20-billion dollars
  • Consolidation of 23 conservation programs into 13, improving program delivery to producers and saving more than six-billion dollars
  • Building on previous investments to fruit and vegetable production, farmers markets and local food systems.
  • Inclusion of several regulatory relief measures to help mitigate burdens farmers, ranchers and rural communities face

The House Agriculture Committee release on the Federal Agriculture Reform and Risk Management Act of 2013 notes reforms to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program will save more than 20-billion dollars. That cut – which comes from changes to categorical eligibility and a requirement that states make at least 20-dollars in payments for energy assistance for people to be eligible for food assistance – is a cut of just 2.5-percent. The cut made to commodity programs is 34-percent. The bill doesn’t include conservation compliance for crop insurance or any income eligibility limitations for crop insurance – nor does it shift international food assistance programs to cash assistance as proposed by the Obama Administration. The FARRM Act creates a Revenue Loss Coverage program – the equivalent of the Senate Agricultural Risk Coverage program – and a Price Loss Coverage program with payments based on reference or target prices. Both of these programs would make payments on current planted acreage up to a level of the farm’s overall base acreage. The new cotton program known as STAX is included in the measure – but it does not include a target price. The program would be based on revenue – with payments made on loss of revenue in a county. The hope is that this can resolve the WTO cotton case the U.S. lost to Brazil. Because the Risk Management Agency has said it can’t implement STAX for the 2014 crop year – and can’t guarantee it’s availability in all counties for 2015 – cotton growers would receive transition payments for 2014 and 2015.

Source: National Association of Farm Broadcasters

Share

USDA Projects Record Corn Crop

USDA released its monthly Crop Production and Supply and Demand reports this morning for both the 2012 and 2013 corn, wheat and soybean crops.  The numbers were higher than anticipated but not outside of the range of expectations.  USDA projects that the U.S. will produce both a record corn and soybean crop, with total corn production pegged at 14.1 bbu, breaking the previous record of 13.1 bbu set in 2009.  Soybean production was estimated at 3.39 billion bushels.  As a result of the increase in production both commodities are also looking at more than doubling this year’s carryout.  Carryout for the 2013/2014 corn crop is estimated at 2.004 billion bushels, up from the 759 mbu projected for 2012 crop.  Soybean carryout for 2013 is projected at 269 mbu, up 140 mbu from the 125 mbu projected for the 2012 marketing year.

Aside from the Supply and Demand Estimates, USDA also released its first look at the 2013 U.S. Winter Wheat Crop. USDA projects a nine percent reduction in total wheat production, due entirely to the poor condition of hard red winter wheat and it’s current weather struggles.  However, usage is also projected to decrease due to lower export and feed demand leaving a projected carryout for the 2013 wheat crop of 670 million bushels.

On a state by state basis, the ND winter wheat crop is forecasted at 17.7 million bushels, down 56% from last year.  Yield is also projected 3 bushels lower at 52 bushels per acre.  The South Dakota winter wheat crop production estimate is not posted as of this writing but is reporting a winter wheat condition rating of 62% poor to very poor compared to 6% good to excellent.

Share

U.S. Senate Introduces Legislation to Help Farmers and Ranchers Manage Risk

U.S. Senate          The measure will exempt farmers, ranchers from regulations, strengthen rural economies

U.S. Senators Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) are leading a bipartisan group of Senators in introducing a bill to clarify the exemption for farmers, ranchers, manufacturers and small businesses from margin requirements included in the Dodd-Frank financial legislation. These exempted groups, known as end-users, use derivatives to manage their risk and insure against extreme price fluctuations for commodities and inputs – like seed and fertilizer – critical to their business operations.

Joining Johanns and Tester to introduce the bill are Senators   Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn).

The bill introduced by the senators is identical to H.R. 634, which today unanimously passed the House of Representatives’ Financial Services Committee. It clarifies current law by making explicit that commercial end-users are not subject to costly margin requirements, consistent with Congress’ intent in Dodd-Frank.

The National Association of Manufacturers supports the bill, saying:

“The NAM – the nation’s largest industry trade association –applauds the leadership of Sens. Johanns and Tester in introducing a bill to ensure that end-users, including thousands of manufacturers, will not be subject to onerous margin requirements imposed by regulators,” said Dorothy Coleman, Vice President of Tax and Domestic Policy at NAM. “End-users use derivatives as a tool to hedge day-to-day commercial risk to mitigate against changes in currency and interest rate valuations and commodity prices — not for speculative purposes.

“Even a cursory review of the legislative history surrounding the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act demonstrates that the authors always intended end-users to be exempt from these requirements and this bill ensures that this intention is clearly written into statute. Manufacturers urge the Senate to swiftly pass this bipartisan legislation and provide much needed certainty to end-users.”

Johanns said, “Farmers, ranchers and businesses use every tool available to responsibly protect themselves and their customers from unforeseen risks like drought or fluctuations in fuel, fertilizer or commodity prices. Our bipartisan legislation allows these local businesses to continue doing that without battling burdensome and costly margin requirements meant to cover day-traders playing the markets.”

End-users are the final user of a good or product. Ranchers, for example, could purchase derivatives contracts on corn in advance of the harvest to protect themselves against unforeseen market fluctuations. Dodd-Frank included margin requirements forcing non-end-users and those speculating on market prices to post margin to cover the risks associated with their derivative purchases.

Dodd-Frank included an exemption for non-financial end-users based on the low risks they pose to the financial system. Despite Congress’ intent, there has been a debate over how broadly the exemption would apply. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission previously issued a joint rule that would exempt end-users from margin, but the Federal Reserve has issued regulations that would capture many end-users in their regulations.

Share