NAEGA Urges Alternative Actions in Testimony before Section 301 Committee

Share:
xrddagbi-0ynio14j2195929758792115556t24041511

(Washington D.C.) — Alejandra Castillo, president and CEO of the North American Export Grain Association (NAEGA), testified this week before the Section 301 Committee’s public hearing on the United States Trade  Representative’s proposed actions in relation to its investigation of China’s targeting of the maritime,  logistics, and shipbuilding sectors for dominance. 

Acknowledging the findings of USTR’s Section 301 investigation in relation to China’s pursuit of dominance  in the maritime, logistics and shipbuilding sectors through non-market practices over a series of decades,  Ms. Castillo said NAEGA welcomes the U.S. government’s focus on restoring domestic shipbuilding  capacities. However, she also underscored that the proposed actions would not address China’s practices  but would rather erode U.S market share of trade in agricultural commodities and harm American farmers  and the agricultural economy.  

NAEGA urged USTR to explore alternative responses to China’s targeting of the maritime, logistics and  shipbuilding sectors that did not cause irreversible harm to U.S. bulk agricultural exports and erode the  United States’ trade surplus in these commodities.  

The testimony was supported by written comments and economic analysis submitted by NAEGA, the  National Grain and Feed Association (NGFA) and the National Oilseed Processors Association (NOPA). 

The associations’ statement points out that nearly one fourth of all grain and 40% of all oilseeds grown in  the U.S. are exported, delivering a $65 billion trade surplus. It further highlights that while nearly 300 bulk  vessels call on U.S. ports each month to ship U.S. agricultural commodities, there is a mismatch in available  U.S.-built vessels as “just 7 bulk carriers are flying the American flag, and only 5 were built in the United  States.” 

Ms. Castillo said that the consequences of the proposals would affect all American agriculture, including  the inland transportation, processing, manufacturing, and production agriculture sectors.  

The proposed port entry fees would cause a cost increase of between $15 and $40 per metric ton for many  U.S. agriculture exports. These increases are sufficient to drive down U.S. agricultural export  competitiveness, lower farmgate prices, and reduce U.S. farm output, leading to a contraction in U.S.  exportable supply.  

As a result, it is estimated that the port entry fees would reduce wheat, soybean and corn farmers’  production revenue by a cumulative $16-17 billion per year. 

In the face of the expected consequences from the proposed actions, Ms. Castillo said “we encourage the  U.S. government to consider alternative approaches that stimulate domestic shipbuilding as opposed to  port entry fees and export restrictions that will penalize U.S. agriculture to the benefit of global competitors”.  

ABOUT NAEGA 

The North American Export Grain Association (NAEGA), a not-for-profit trade association established in  1912, consists of private and publicly owned companies and farmer-owned cooperatives that are involved  in and provide services to the agri-bulk products international trading industry. NAEGA’s mission is to  promote and sustain the reliability of commercial agricultural exports.

Related Posts

Loading...